Friday, September 25, 2009

Insects in Brave New World



In the “Preface” for J. H. Burns’ A Vision of Education, Being an Imaginary Verbatim Report of the First Interplanetary Conference, published in 1929, Aldous Huxley begins to show the genesis of his ideas that appear in Brave New World. Jerome Meckier, in “A Neglected Huxley ‘preface’: his Early Synopsis of Brave New World,” traces Huxley’s ideas back to Helvetius’ educational philosophy. Within his philosophy, Helvetius thought that “[a]ny man [. . . ] could be made into a genius, for intellectually superior individuals are made, not born” (Meckier, 3). Huxley does not uphold this belief; instead, he presents us, in Brave New World, with the “iceberg” model. In this model, a small percentage of the society would be “genius” while the rest would consists of workers. In this arrangement, every individual would have a specific role that works for the betterment of society.


While Huxley presents the “iceberg” model satirically in the novel, he appears to hold to the idea that neither this model nor Helvetius’ thoughts (as demonstrated in the “Cyprus Experiment”) constitute ideal ways to proceed. However, he feels that the future will incorporate the “iceberg” model into its educational practices. He writes, in Burns’ “Preface,”


[children] would be allowed to develop only so far as was compatible with the advantage of the race. Any signs of outstanding individuality would be ruthlessly suppressed, or at any rate canalized in radically useful channels. Every art or compulsion and suggestion would be used to enforce the ethics of total self-abnegation. The systemic breeding of useful individuals and the systematic suppression of he useless would form a natural complement to this system of more than Spartan education. Special sub-species would be bred (and having been bred, specially educated) for the purpose, for example, of working in hot climates, at high altitudes, in the dark, under great atmospheric pressure; while other varieties would be produced by selection to perform specialized intellectual functions. (qtd. in Meckier, 8)


This creation of “[s]pecial sub-species” would lead to what Huxley refers to as a “termite-ideal.” With this ideal in mind, we can examine how Huxley’s use of insect imagery correlates to the overt loss of individuality presented in Brave New World.


Throughout the novel, the “self-abnegation” of the individuals in the society becomes apparent. Within a two page section, when Henry and Lenina fly on their “date,” Huxley refers to the different speeds of the helicopter as insect sounds: hornet, wasp, mosquito, bumble-bee, cockchafer, and stag-beetle (66). Along with the speeds of the helicopter, Huxley also produces insect imagery when Lenina and Henry see the “Red Rocket.” It “suddenly dropped [from a cloud as] a small scarlet insect, buzzing as it fell” (66). As they fly along, Lenina observes that the “green [in Central London park] was maggoty with fore-shortened life” (67). These references, while apparently superficial, help to reinforce the “termite-ideal” that Huxley presented in his “Preface.” By setting up the imagery of insects with insignificant items such as the helicopter, rocket, and grass, Huxley ends the two page aerial trip with a view of the shift change at the Television Corporation’s factory. Here, Lenina and Henry observe workers “[l]like aphides and ants” (67) changing shifts. At this point, the imagery transfers from the society’s tools to the individuals that participate within it. Huxley continues to draw upon this insect imagery near the end of Lenina and Henry’s date. He says, as the two fly home, “[t]he approaches to the monorail station were black with the ant-like pullulation of lower-caste activity” (76). This aerial view adds even more to the imagery being presented. With an elevated, almost god-like view, Henry and Lenina see an image of the society working as a single organism, and they do not feel bothered by the “self-abnegation” of the individual at all. Instead, they condone its actions and peer upon it from on high.


On the other hand, John, as he visits Linda on her deathbed, encounters a group of eight-year-old twins. As the group continues to file in towards Lind’s bed, “the ward was maggoty with them. They swarmed between the beds [. . . ]” (183). Again, Huxley employs “maggoty” and “swarmed” in describing a group of individuals within the society. They act as one, think as one, and suppress “any signs of outstanding individuality.” They, in effect, act as ants or termites working for the betterment of the colony. After Linda dies, and John makes his way out of the hospital, he encounters 162 Deltas waiting in a soma distribution line. Here, he notices “the nightmare of swarming indistinguishable sameness” (189-90). This reminds him of the twins who appeared as “maggots” as they “swarmed” around Linda’s deathbed. However, the Deltas looked like “[m]aggots again, but larger, full grown, they now crawled across his grief and his repentance” (190). Again, John sees the complete lack of individuality that this educational system supports.


The end of the novel returns to the insect imagery. Here, as John becomes pestered by onlookers and inquirers, he sees “the arrival overhead of a great swarm of helicopters” (226). As the aerial machines get closer, they appear as “locusts” or “giant grasshoppers” descending upon him. Interestingly enough, the views that John sees, when the insect imagery appears, counters Lenina and Henry’s view. Instead of viewing the events from above, as a type of social superiority, John views the actions from ground level, looking up at descending insects and interacting with them on the ground. What importance, exactly, does this difference in views have? At this point, I do not have an answer.


Huxley, throughout Brave New World, satirizes the movement of the educational system towards “self-abnegation.” With his use of insect imagery, both overtly referring to insects and using verbs and adjectives that we relate to insects, Huxley shows us that if things move forward the way they appear to be going that the “termite-ideal” will be reached. The attainment of this ideal, as we can see in the novel, does not provide much hope for the future.

Works Cited

Huxley, Aldous. Brave New World. New York: Harper Perennial, 2005.

Meckier, Jerome. "A Neglected Huxley "Preface": His Earliest Synopsis of Brave New World." Twentieth-

Century Literature 25.1 (1979): 1-20.

Monday, September 14, 2009

Commodification and knowledge




You know, I really can't say that these ideas, or philosophies, hold true for the entirety, or sections, of underground hip-hop today, because I do not have a deep knowledge of the musical genre. However, I believe I can say that the songs I want to discuss present ideas of knowledge and artistic responsibility that really have a strong resonance in society today.

For the past few years, I have really worn out Audition by P.O.S., and I believe that I have worn out his new album, Never Better, even more (it's only been out since February). Before I tackle "Let It Rattle," off of Never Better, I really want to say a few things about "Half-Cocked Concepts" from Audition.

This song, while politically charged at the opening, really encapsulates what appears to be a manifesto from P.O.S. The chorus screams it loud:

Get up
Get out
Get up
And get something done!

In the song, the last line has been misinterpreted as "and get fucked up." P.O.S. says he doesn't correct people when they make this interpretation because it still fits with the overall feel of the song.

After an intro that denounces Bush and gives props to the individuals who have supported him, P.O.S. gets into the meat of his message. The conclusion of the third stanza, "Just games for days, busy bees makin' our honey/ and skee ball tickets still don't count as real money," conveys the though that while we keep ourselves busy, working, and enjoying our luxury items (that we may not be able to afford), we do not have real funds coming in. Instead, we spend waste time that could be spent for better endeavors, in this case, art.

He proceeds, at least to me, to present the key argument for art I am encountering a lot in my Pound and Eliot class right now. P.O.S. raps,

It's somethin' so ridiculous,
Funny, so fuckin' sick of this,
Consistent lack of vision from children claimin' they're listenin'

Still I'm sittin' [can't decipher this word] and laughin' while they're all missin' this
There's still songs about bitches, from 9/11 witnesses

With these lines, he tackles the mentality of youth that says one thing, especially when it comes to knowledge and wisdom, but acts teh compelte oppisite, not learning anything from the teacher. In a broader context, this line could refer to the fact that most of us do not learn from what happens aroudn us. The key point for this idea occurs with "There's still songs about bitches, from 9/11 witnesses." Art to make money and gain popularity, not for change and social betterment.

Later on, he attacks, as he does with most of his targets, with compacted lines that speak volumes to the lsitener. He says, "A fool among the scholars/ Bumpin' somethin' about clubs, bubs, and hubs." Again, he appears to atatck commerical rap and the commodification of an art form. As for our obsessions with celebrities, he raps about "Jen and Ben" (one line, quick reference, that says it all). During the entire course of these "observations," P.O.S. counters them. To the former lines in this paragraph, he writes,

I got a message in a bottle
Written in gas and oil
Signed with a rag and a match
Here, catch!
Slap to rebel yell
The rebels fell, embedded in brick
Ain't no fuckin' marble memorial
For pissed off kids waitin' for Death Wish 6

The ones who coose to go against tthe grain, rbel, have no "marble memorial." Still, if we don't get up, get out, and get something done, none of us will be remembered.



It's getting late. Soon, hopefully, I will get to "Let it Rattle." Below, you'll find a live video of P.O.S. performing the song. Watch it, read the lyrics, and let me know what your thoughts are. I really like what he says at the beginning of the performance.



Along with these two songs, I really want to discuss Saul Williams' "Peadagogue of Young Gods." It is on The Inevitable Rise and Fall of Niggy Tardust. However, I need some more time to really look over this work. As a teacher, it really impacts me, but I know there is more to it. Right now, I really look at it from the angle of a teacher, especially in relation to some of my students who have never heard of any African American authors, and I am teaching in a area where Ernest Gaines resides. It blows my mind.